Impacts of home country's institutional environment on OFDI dual margin (2023)

Table of Contents
Abstract Introduction Section snippets Measurement of Institutional Environment Methodology Moran's I and Geary's C test Conclusion References (47) Location selection of foreign direct investment: Is institutional factor important? -- based on the perspective of investment motivation Economic Longitude How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China Journal of World Business Industrial location and public infrastucture Journal of International Economics Outward foreign direct investment from emerging economies: Escaping home country regulative voids International Business Review Firm heterogeneity and structure of U.S. Multinational activity Journal of International Economics Investment location and institutional development in transition economies International Business Review Evolution of bilateral capital flows to developing countries at intensive and extensive margins Factor flow, spatial knowledge spillover and economic growth in regional innovation effect R&D Economic Research Journal Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment The World Economy The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment Journal of International Business Studies Research on the growth path of China's OFDI -- Based on the perspective of binary margin analysis Asia Pacific Economics China's investment in foreign countries Management Science Institutional distance, "demonstration effect" and location distribution of OFDI in China International Trade Issues The influence of host country corruption on China's OFDI under institutional constraints: A threshold effect test based on transnational panel data Economic Problems Policy motivation of China's OFDI: A new empirical study Technical Economics and Management Research Research on the influence of institutional environment of countries along the "belt and road" on location choice of Chinese enterprises' overseas M&A World Economic Research Study on the influence of home country system factors on China's inter-provincial OFDI: An empirical analysis based on the panel data GMM model of 31 provinces and cities The influence of institutional distance on outward FDI: Empirical research based on dynamic panel model International Economic and Trade Exploration Sample selection bias as a specification Error Econometrica Location analysis of China's OFDI: Are political factors important? Shanghai Economic Research Regional economic growth and its Convergence in China: Spatial panel data analysis Southern Economics The institional effectson strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies:China VS Russia Organization Science China's investment in Developing Countries - does the host country system matter? Management World Cited by (0) Recommended articles (6) Time and frequency dynamic connectedness between cryptocurrencies and financial assets in China The impact of confucian culture on the cost of equity capital: The moderating role of marketization process Does social insurance stimulate business creation? Evidence from China Industrial linkage and clustered regional business cycles in China Challenges for volatility forecasts of US fossil energy spot markets during the COVID-19 crisis Multidimensional cultural distance and self-employment of internal migrants in China

Volume 87,

September 2023

, Pages 54-67

Author links open overlay panel,

Abstract

This study uses SDM model, SLM model and SEM model to investigate the impacts of the institutional environment of the home country on OFDI dual margin. The study reveals that there is a spatial spillover effect of the institutional environment on the dual margin. Then, The institutional environment is divided into economic environment, political environment and legal environment. The degree of financial support, legalization and corruption all have significant influence on the dual margin, but the impacts on the margin of expansion and the margin of intensification are discrepant. Furthermore, in order to analyze the regional heterogeneity of the impact of institutional environment factors on dual margin, China is divided into three regions, namely east, middle and west for sub-sample study. The study found that the impact of institutional environment does exist regional differences and spatial spillovers. Our results remain unchanged after robustness checks.

Introduction

Since 2008 when the world economy was impacted by the outbreak of the global financial crisis, over the past decade, global FDI has been lacking in growth momentum, and been sluggish and stagnant for a long time. Affected by COVID-19, global foreign direct investment in 2020 was about $1 trillion, down 35 percent from about $1.5 trillion in 2019, which is lower than the trough after the global financial crisis in2009.1To reverse the current sluggish situation of international direct investment in post-pandemic era, policy makers around the globe have intensified institutional reforms based on their own institutional environment. On the whole, most of the newly formulated investment policies and measures in most countries continue to move towards liberalization and facilitation (Chen et al., 2012; He & Guo, 2009; Li, 2012). Many countries have lowered or eliminated the threshold for foreign investors in some industries and further streamlined the administrative examination and approval procedures for foreign investment in China and some countries have even formulated new fiscal incentive measures targeted at FDI in specific industries and regions. Additionally, in order to better promote the development of international direct investment, international investment agreements between countries have been supplemented and revised accordingly (Alan et al., 2004; Benassy et al., 2010; Guo & Huang, 2010). UNCTAD statistics show there are 2896 bilateral investment treaties worldwide so far, with 2337 in force, of which over one-third of the measures have new restrictions or regulations added.1 Thus it can be seen that governments of all countries attach great importance to the impact of the institutional environment on international direct investment, and expect to create a favorable international investment environment through institutional reforms, thereby attracting more high-quality foreign capital and improving the performance gains of domestic enterprises in transnational investment and operations (Araugo et al., 2015; Chen and Li, 2011; Zeng & Yu, 2020). The study of OFDI from the perspective of home country's institutional environment not only has a strong explanatory power for China's OFDI in the process of reform and opening up, but also other developing countries and emerging economies may face the same problems in outward investment, such as the late start time of outward direct investment, the relatively immature development of market economy, and the imperfect management and system of the government. Therefore, China's exploration in the field of international investment is of great practical reference significance to the international investment of developing countries and emerging economies with similar development experiences and levels.

With China as the research object, the influence mechanism of the home country's institutional environment on the OFDI dual margin is discussed in this thesis by splitting the OFDI into the extensive margin and the investment margin, and building a OFDI model with the home country's institutional environmental factor embedded. And on this basis, a spatial Dubin model is built to study the impact of the institutional environmental on China's OFDI dual margin; to further study the spatial differences of institutional environmental on China's OFDI dual margin, three major areas: eastern, central and western regions is surveyed as sub-samples. Finally, the conclusions is obtained by summarizing the results of theoretical and empirical research.

The likely marginal contribution of this study is: Firstly, our study expands the relevant studies on institutional environment and OFDI, Most of the previous literature believes that the institutional environment of the host country has an important impact on the enterprises' overseas investment from the static perspective, the institutional environment of a country or region not only affects its own region but also has spillover effects on other regions, the paper discusses how institutional environment affects a country's foreign investment from the dynamic perspective of the home country. Second, we find that the expansion margin and the intensive margin of the institutional environment for outward investment are different. Previous literatures mainly regarded outward direct investment as a whole. By referring to the binary decomposition method of OFDI growth of Yeaple (2009) and Araujo et al. (2015), this paper divides outward investment into extended margin and intensive margin and discusses the different influences of institutional environment on the dual margin of investment. Thirdly, the influences of the different institutional environments of the home country on the dual marginal have regional heterogeneity. Different regional financial support, legalization level, intellectual property protection and corruption level may affect the dual margin and spatial spillover of regional investment. (Chen et al., 2016). Therefore, three spatial panel models are selected in this paper: SDM model, SLM model and SEM model, to study the influence of the home country institutional environment on the OFDI regional heterogeneity, and to analyze the spatial spillover effect of the home country institutional environment.

This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 reviews the related literature on Constitutional environment and OFDI. Section 3 introduces the data, variables, and methodology used in this study. Section 4 provides the empirical results and analysis. Section 5 provides the conclusion.

Section snippets

Measurement of Institutional Environment

Due to the different emphasis of research, there lacks a consensus on the measurement method of the institutional environment in academia, and international organizations and scholars at home and abroad have their own measurement methods.

  • 1.

    International Organizations' Measurement of Institutional Environment

To better measure the institutional environments of different countries, some international organizations have issued corresponding institutional environment measurement indicators, which have

Methodology

Since that the impact of the home country's institutional environment on the OFDI dual margin is not independent of each other, for example, a province's OFDI dual margin is not only affected by the local institutional environment, but may also be affected by institutional environments and OFDI in other provinces. This article adopts the spatial econometric analysis model that takes into consideration the spatial correlation of the impact of the home country's institutional environment to study

Moran's I and Geary's C test

Before performing spatial regression analysis on the model, the author of this paper firstly tested whether there is spatial autocorrelation in the OFDI dual margin of China's provinces by adopting the two spatial correlation test methods: Moran's I and Geary's C.

From the test results in Table 1 and Table 2, it can be known that all the tests rejected the null hypothesis at the 1% significant level, indicating that the OFDI extensive margin and intensive margin of China's provinces feature

Conclusion

The previous literature has studied the influence of institutional environment on foreign investment from a static perspective. In this paper, the spatial econometric model is further used to study their effects from a dynamic perspective, Our results indicate that China's OFDI dual margin is to affected by the home country's institutional environment. Newly built overseas branches and additional outward investment by enterprises are not only subject to the local institutional environment, but

References (47)

  • L.L. Chen et al.

    Location selection of foreign direct investment: Is institutional factor important? -- based on the perspective of investment motivation

    Economic Longitude

    (2011)

  • Y. Luo et al.

    How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China

    Journal of World Business

    (2010)

  • P. Martin et al.

    Industrial location and public infrastucture

    Journal of International Economics

    (1995)

  • C. Stoian et al.

    Outward foreign direct investment from emerging economies: Escaping home country regulative voids

    International Business Review

    (2016)

  • S.R. Yeaple

    Firm heterogeneity and structure of U.S. Multinational activity

    Journal of International Economics

    (2009)

  • b. Alan et al.

    Investment location and institutional development in transition economies

    International Business Review

    (2004)

  • J. Araujo et al.

    Evolution of bilateral capital flows to developing countries at intensive and extensive margins

    (2015)

  • J.H. Bai et al.

    Factor flow, spatial knowledge spillover and economic growth in regional innovation effect R&D

    Economic Research Journal

    (2017)

  • Q.A. Benassy et al.

    Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment

    The World Economy

    (2010)

  • P.J. Buckley et al.

    The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment

    Journal of International Business Studies

    (2007)

  • P.R. Chen et al.

    Research on the growth path of China's OFDI -- Based on the perspective of binary margin analysis

    Asia Pacific Economics

    (2016)

  • Y. Chen et al.

    China's investment in foreign countries

    Management Science

    (2012)

  • M. Deng

    Institutional distance, "demonstration effect" and location distribution of OFDI in China

    International Trade Issues

    (2012)

  • F.H. Deng

    The influence of host country corruption on China's OFDI under institutional constraints: A threshold effect test based on transnational panel data

    Economic Problems

    (2013)

  • L.J. Dong

    Policy motivation of China's OFDI: A new empirical study

    Technical Economics and Management Research

    (2011)

  • L.L. Ge et al.

    Research on the influence of institutional environment of countries along the "belt and road" on location choice of Chinese enterprises' overseas M&A

    World Economic Research

    (2020)

  • J. Gong

    Study on the influence of home country system factors on China's inter-provincial OFDI: An empirical analysis based on the panel data GMM model of 31 provinces and cities

  • S.W. Guo et al.

    The influence of institutional distance on outward FDI: Empirical research based on dynamic panel model

    International Economic and Trade Exploration

    (2010)

  • J.J. Heckman

    Sample selection bias as a specification Error

    Econometrica

    (1979)

  • S. He et al.

    Location analysis of China's OFDI: Are political factors important?

    Shanghai Economic Research

    (2009)

  • J. He et al.

    Regional economic growth and its Convergence in China: Spatial panel data analysis

    Southern Economics

    (2006)

  • M. Hitt et al.

    The institional effectson strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies:China VS Russia

    Organization Science

    (2004)

  • G.H. Jiang et al.

    China's investment in Developing Countries - does the host country system matter?

    Management World

    (2012)

  • Cited by (0)

    Recommended articles (6)

    • Research article

      Time and frequency dynamic connectedness between cryptocurrencies and financial assets in China

      International Review of Economics & Finance, Volume 86, 2023, pp. 46-57

      This paper explored the connectedness of dynamic time-frequency between cryptocurrencies and traditional financial assets in China using a weekly dataset from September 4, 2015 to March 4, 2022. We found that cryptocurrencies were the primary contributors to the connectedness system and the primary risk sources for traditional financial assets in China. We also found that cryptocurrencies were the main net transmitters of dynamic spillovers, while China's traditional financial assets were the primary net receivers. In addition, conventional financial assets were more sharply influenced by cryptocurrencies in the short term because the level of spillovers was more significant than in the long term, and spillover fluctuations were intense during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings provide empirical support for the Chinese State Council's current policy regarding crackdowns on cryptocurrencies.

    • Research article

      The impact of confucian culture on the cost of equity capital: The moderating role of marketization process

      International Review of Economics & Finance, Volume 86, 2023, pp. 112-126

      The cost of equity capital (COEC) is a crucial component of investment decisions and corporate performance evaluations. In the process of corporate financing, an inadequate formal system may lead to the phenomenon of “Bad money drives out good”. While Confucian culture can compensate for the deficiency of the formal system by influencing the value orientation of the actors. Therefore, this paper examines the impact of Confucian culture on firms’ cost of equity capital (COEC) from an informal institutional perspective. Our study presents robust findings that firms headquartered in areas with strong Confucian culture have lower costs of equity capital, and the marketization process has a moderating effect on the relationship between Confucian culture and the COEC. The impact of Confucian culture on the COEC of firms is mainly achieved through three ways: reducing information risk, reducing business risk and mitigating agency problems. Further, foreign cultural shocks will weaken the relationship between Confucian culture and the COEC. These results remain robust after controlling for the endogeneity problem. This study indicates that Confucian culture, as an invisible complementary governance mechanism of the formal system, plays an important and positive role in “reducing the COEC”.

    • Research article

      Does social insurance stimulate business creation? Evidence from China

      Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Volume 79, 2023, Article 101988

      This study investigates the causal effects of social health insurance on business creation. Since 2007, China has launched a health insurance program for urban residents without formal employment, i.e., the Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI). By exploiting the natural experiment, we conduct a staggered difference-in-differences to show that URBMI significantly enhances new firm creation. Results are robust after addressing endogeneity and using alternative dataset. The above effect is particularly pronounced in regions with high level of intellectual property protection, financial development, human capital, and social trust. Finally, risk taking is a plausible mechanism through which health insurance affects entrepreneurship.

    • Research article

      Industrial linkage and clustered regional business cycles in China

      International Review of Economics & Finance, Volume 85, 2023, pp. 59-72

      This paper applies the common Markov-switching panel data model from Hamilton and Owyang (2012) to study the similarities and differences across China’s provinces with different industrial linkage characteristics in terms of the timing of entering a contraction. This paper first derives the national business cycles, thus finding short-term contractions not well identified in the existing literature. Second, this paper classifies 30 provinces into four clusters based on the input–output linkages between industries to study the similarities and differences across the provincial business cycles. The results of this paper show a few regional business cycles coincide with the nation’s, but most idiosyncratic cluster contractions exhibit differences in timing around the national contractions. The results also find that contractions of some clusters are likely to spread nationwide. Finally, this paper investigates the reasons for business cycle synchronization.

    • Research article

      Challenges for volatility forecasts of US fossil energy spot markets during the COVID-19 crisis

      International Review of Economics & Finance, Volume 86, 2023, pp. 31-45

      The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a slowdown in the world's energy trade and changes in the use of energy resources. Meanwhile, global conditions are complex and can affect fossil energy spot markets, including crude oil, gasoline, heating oil, and natural gas. In this paper, we conduct comparative research to explore the impact of global conditions on fossil energy spot markets during the COVID-19 crisis based on the GARCH-MIDAS framework. We employ a 2010–2022 sample, which we cut off to investigate the differences before and after COVID-19. In-sample estimation shows that all global indicators are significant for forecasting the volatilities of these fossil energy spot prices. Out-sample forecasts reveal that GEPU and GECON outperform GPR and WIP for forecasting these four markets during the pre-COVID-19 period. After the crisis broke out, these global indicators can provide different forecasting information. Hence, this paper can be helpful for decision-makers to formulate and adjust pertinent policies and investments in the case of extreme emergencies in the future.

    • Research article

      Multidimensional cultural distance and self-employment of internal migrants in China

      International Review of Economics & Finance, Volume 86, 2023, pp. 58-81

      This research examines the roles of multidimensional cultural distance including both value and practice on supporting urbanization, focusing on self-employment of internal migrants in China. Prior to examining the effect of cultural distance, we confirm that self-employment is the dominant choice for urban migrants. Building on Hofstede's theory, we calculating the Kogut and Singh Index of cultural values and cultural practices based on survey data set of World Values. After combining these two indices with China Migrants Dynamic Survey data to construct a comprehensive cross-sectional dataset of 521,166 observational samples from 2010 to 2016, we show that both cultural value distance and cultural practice distance have a negative effect on self-employment of internal migrants in China. According to the theory of labor market segmentation, our results reveal that cultural distance is strongly negative associated with the likelihood for internal migrants to engage in self-employment both for opportunity purpose and necessary purpose. From heterogeneity analysis, negative effects of cultural distances exist in the service industry, manufacturing industry, and the Yangtze River Delta. Further discussion shows that cultural value distance also has an indirect influence on individual behavior through cultural practice. Our results suggest that cultural distance prevents migrants from integrating into the local labor market in the form of self-employment.

    View full text

    © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Prof. Nancy Dach

    Last Updated: 03/05/2023

    Views: 6073

    Rating: 4.7 / 5 (57 voted)

    Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Prof. Nancy Dach

    Birthday: 1993-08-23

    Address: 569 Waelchi Ports, South Blainebury, LA 11589

    Phone: +9958996486049

    Job: Sales Manager

    Hobby: Web surfing, Scuba diving, Mountaineering, Writing, Sailing, Dance, Blacksmithing

    Introduction: My name is Prof. Nancy Dach, I am a lively, joyous, courageous, lovely, tender, charming, open person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.